Top

100 Powerful Defenses to Loitering or Prowling Charges in Georgia

A Complete Legal Guide to Loitering or Prowling Charges in Georgia

Being arrested or cited for loitering or prowling under O.C.G.A. § 16-11-36 can feel frustrating, confusing, and even humiliating. Maybe you were just waiting for a ride, taking a walk, or simply in the wrong place at the wrong time. Law enforcement often misinterprets innocent behavior as suspicious, leading to unnecessary charges.

But at The Sherman Law Group, we know the law — and we know how to fight it.

With decades of experience defending clients throughout Georgia, we’ve compiled 100 powerful legal defenses that may apply to your case.

Whether it’s a violation of your rights, a lack of evidence, or just a misunderstanding, these defenses can be the difference between a conviction and a clean record.

Below are 100 defenses—each one rooted in real legal strategy—to help you understand your rights and start building a strong defense today.

  1. Lack of Intent – No criminal or suspicious intent was present.
  2. Lawful Purpose – You had a legitimate reason to be there.
  3. No Justifiable Alarm – The officer’s concern was not reasonable.
  4. No Police Inquiry – Police didn’t ask for your ID or reason for presence.
  5. Complied with Police – You explained your presence when asked.
  6. Location Was Public Property – No restrictions on presence.
  7. Waiting for Someone – You were lawfully waiting for a ride, friend, etc.
  8. Exercising Free Speech – Protected activity (e.g., protesting).
  9. No Specific Complaint – No actual complaint was made.
  10. Lack of Witness Credibility – Witness testimony is inconsistent.
  11. Poor Lighting or Visibility – Officer misidentified actions.
  12. No Criminal Record – Clean history undercuts suspicious behavior claim.
  13. Mental Health Issues – Not criminal behavior, but medical in nature.
  14. Racial Profiling – Arrest rooted in discriminatory bias.
  15. Constitutional Challenge – Statute is vague or overbroad.
  16. Lack of Probable Cause – No basis for detention or arrest.
  17. Police Entrapment – Officers created the suspicious situation.
  18. Time of Day Not Relevant – Presence at night isn’t automatically suspicious.
  19. Non-Threatening Conduct – No threatening gestures or behavior.
  20. Recording in Public – Legal right to record or photograph.
  21. Alibi – You were somewhere else at the time.
  22. Mistaken Identity – Wrong person arrested.
  23. Inconsistent Officer Reports – Police narratives don’t align.
  24. Violation of Miranda Rights – Statements inadmissible.
  25. Unlawful Search or Detention – Evidence obtained illegally.
  26. Erroneous Dispatch Information – Officers acted on bad intel.
  27. No Loitering Signage – No posted restrictions.
  28. Reasonable Delay – Car trouble, transit issues, etc.
  29. Unfamiliar Neighborhood – Just lost or exploring.
  30. Photography or Artistic Purpose – Engaged in artistic work.
  31. Job-Related Presence – Work duties required your location.
  32. Delivery or Pickup – Lawful errand at time of stop.
  33. Homeowner or Resident – You lived nearby.
  34. Helping Someone – Assisting someone in need.
  35. On a Phone Call – Delayed while talking.
  36. Waiting for Business to Open – No intent to do harm.
  37. Religious Activity – Protected First Amendment practice.
  38. Silent Protest – Non-disruptive peaceful demonstration.
  39. Insufficient Evidence – Lack of facts to support arrest.
  40. No Criminal Tools Found – No tools to suggest intent.
  41. Weather-Related Shelter – Seeking safety from elements.
  42. Visiting Family or Friends – Innocent reason to be present.
  43. Car Breakdown – Mechanical failure, not criminal intent.
  44. Lost or Confused – No ill motive, just disoriented.
  45. Walking for Exercise – Innocent personal activity.
  46. Officer Misconduct – Bad faith or abuse of power.
  47. Bias-Based Policing – Targeted due to race, gender, or status.
  48. Bodycam Footage Contradicts Report – Video shows lawful behavior.
  49. Witnesses Corroborate Innocence – Others support your version.
  50. Dismissal in Similar Past Cases – Precedent favors dismissal.
  1. Ambiguous Behavior – Your conduct was open to innocent interpretation.
  2. Unlawful Arrest – Arrest was made without a warrant or valid exception.
  3. No Prior Warning Given – Officers failed to provide a warning before arrest.
  4. Selective Enforcement – Others similarly situated were not arrested.
  5. Imprecise Police Narrative – Report lacks specific facts.
  6. Anonymous Tip Only – No corroborating evidence beyond a tip.
  7. Activity Consistent with Innocence – Actions aligned with normal lawful conduct.
  8. Charged Without Investigation – Arrest made prematurely or without proper inquiry.
  9. Poor Police Training – Officer lacked proper legal knowledge.
  10. Unverified Assumptions – Officer jumped to conclusions.
  11. Failure to Record Interaction – No dashcam/bodycam evidence.
  12. Video Surveillance Contradicts Officer – Security footage proves innocence.
  13. No Victim Identified – No person claimed to be threatened.
  14. Area Known for Harassment – Location has a history of profiling.
  15. You Were Not Alone – Presence with others implies legitimate social reason.
  16. No Flight or Evasion – You did not try to flee or avoid contact.
  17. Merely Standing Still – Stillness alone does not equal suspicion.
  18. You Had Permission to Be There – Owner or tenant authorized your presence.
  19. Conduct Took Place on Sidewalk – Public easement with legal right of way.
  20. No Trespass Warning Issued – Lack of notice or signage.
  21. Presence in Daylight Hours – Occurred at non-suspicious time.
  22. Police Prejudged the Situation – They assumed guilt based on appearance.
  23. Prior Bad Blood with Officer – History of conflict makes arrest suspect.
  24. Unreliable Complainant – Accuser has motive to lie.
  25. Officer Lacked Jurisdiction – Officer was outside proper area.
  26. No Actual Threat Identified – No property or person at risk.
  27. Disability or Medical Condition – May explain behavior mistaken as suspicious.
  28. Unclear Boundaries or Signs – No visible property limits.
  29. Waiting for Uber/Lyft – Common, legal reason to stand around.
  30. Engaged in Conversation – Innocent interaction with others.
  31. Officer Fabricated the Report – False narrative or exaggeration.
  32. Detention Was Too Long – Detention exceeded lawful bounds.
  33. No Loitering Policy Violated – No enforceable ordinance or rule.
  34. Clerical or Booking Errors – Case flaws due to mistakes.
  35. Time on Scene Was Brief – Not long enough to constitute loitering.
  36. Charged for Being Homeless – Criminalizing poverty violates constitutional rights.
  37. No Clear Evidence of Fear – Public wasn’t alarmed by presence.
  38. Illegally Obtained Confession – Coerced or improperly gathered statement.
  39. Pretrial Diversion Available – Alternative resolution to criminal charge.
  40. Prosecutor Can’t Meet Burden – Insufficient proof beyond reasonable doubt.
  41. Location Commonly Used by Public – Park, plaza, or other shared space.
  42. Ambiguous Statutory Language – Law is open to challenge for vagueness.
  43. Prosecutorial Discretion Abuse – Overzealous or biased prosecution.
  44. Inadequate Notice of Law – You weren’t aware of specific rules or curfew.
  45. Violation of Equal Protection – Arrest motivated by impermissible classification.
  46. You Left Upon Request – You complied when asked to leave.
  47. No Evidence of Crime Prevention – No crime was being deterred.
  48. Family Emergency – Situation required your presence at that location.
  49. Preexisting Relationship with Area – You previously worked, lived, or frequented the space.
  50. Case Law Favors Dismissal – Prior decisions support dropping the charge.

Ready to Fight Your Loitering or Prowling Charge? Georgia Loitering or Prowling Lawyer Near Me

A loitering or prowling charge might seem minor, but the consequences can be lasting: a criminal record, employment barriers, and reputational harm. Fortunately, you’re not powerless — and you don’t have to face it alone.

The loitering and prowling attorneys at The Sherman Law Group take every case seriously. We analyze the evidence, challenge improper police conduct, and leverage every available defense to protect our clients. With 100 potential defenses at our fingertips, we know how to challenge these charges effectively in Georgia courts.

Call us today for a confidential consultation. Let’s discuss your case, your options, and how we can help you move forward with confidence and peace of mind.

Categories: 
Related Posts
  • Loitering or Prowling in Georgia: Understanding the Law, Penalties, and Defenses Read More
/

Contact Our Offices

Whether you have questions or you’re ready to get started, our legal team is ready to help. Complete our form below or call us at (678) 712-8561.

  • Please enter your first name.
  • Please enter your last name.
  • Please enter your phone number.
    This isn't a valid phone number.
  • Please enter your email address.
    This isn't a valid email address.
  • Please make a selection.
  • Please enter a message.